THE CENTER FOR COPYRIGHT INTEGRITY
  • HOME
    • IP DATA
    • ABOUT CARRIE DEVORAH
  • (C)OPYRIGHT UNIVER$ITY
    • LAWYERS WHO USE LAW AS A CUDGEL
  • COPY.RIGHTs
    • COPYRIGHTS ARE OFTEN WRONGED >
      • "HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU" DECISION SPELLS TROUBLE FOR ONLINERS CLAIMING PUBLIC DOMAIN AS THEIR OWN & PAIN FOR AUTHORS FIGHTING FOR THEIR BOOKS
      • HARPER LEE & THE MYSTERY OF HER NEWLY FOUND "GOLDEN GOOSE" TKAM
      • ENTREPRENEURSHIP ONLINE
      • TECHNOLOGY & LIFE >
        • POKEMON GO & CAMEL JOE ARE TWO OF A MARKETING KIND, almost
        • BILL COSBY, PEREZ HILTON, VENTURE CAPITALISTS & SAFE HARBOR
    • 2D IP (ARTS Intellectual Property) THEFT ONLINE >
      • SLAPP!!!!!!!!! SENATE CUFFS THE WRONG PEOPLE
      • SLATER'S SELFIE MONKEY SAGA
      • COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS 101
    • ID (Identity) THEFT Online >
      • STOP IDENTITY THEFT ONLINE BY INVOKING CA Civil Code 3344-6
    • RIGHT OF PUBLICITY...... >
      • ALL IS FAIR IN SOCIAL MEDIA TO HOLD INTENTIONAL TENANT FRAUDSTERS TO TASK
      • REDSKINS & ETIQUETTE
    • FAIR USE? NOT WHEN TECH TAKES YOUR $$$
    • CHAFFEE AMENDMENT IS NOT ABOUT STEALING ARTS-iSTs BLIND
    • TECHNOLOGY & Regulations
    • PRIVACY ONLINE SEDUCED THE GREAT REVEAL
    • SECURITY ONLINE & OFF IS NOT SECURE >
      • OUR TAKEAWAY POST THE SAN BERNARDINO DISABILITY CENTER MURDERSge
      • THOUGHTS ON KEEPING THE LIFE LIGHTS ON IN THE FACE OF TERRORISM
      • WHAT TO DEMAND OF RESPONDERS POST PARIS
      • WHY BAD TERRORISM THINGS WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN TO INNOCENT PEOPLE
  • COPYRIGHT LAW TALKs
    • THE WHITE HOUSE 2016
    • THE WHITE HOUSE 2015 (July) -
    • The BERNE CONVENTION : Where America Joined Late >
      • TITLE XVII : The Founding Fathers Promise Of Property Rights
      • THE FOUNDING FATHERS America's Original Inventors & Entrepreneurs
      • MAGNA CARTA The GRANDMOTHER Of IP
    • INTERNATIONAL.EU COPYRIGHT CONVERSATIONS >
      • 1939 GERMANY WALTER HALLSTEIN WARNED
      • THE ROYALS
      • THE UK GOVERNMENT ASKED FOR COMMENTS SO I COMMENTED
      • THE VATICAN & ITS NEW FINANCIAL OIG RENEE BRUHOLDT
      • UNITED NATIONS
      • CHINA: ERIX CHEN
    • ICANN . IANA . WIPO >
      • THE DISASTER IMMINENT POST IANA TAKEN AWAY FROM US TAXPAYERS WHO PAID FOR IT
      • THE EZUBAO STORY THAT IS THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’s PROBLEM & ICANNs
      • ICANN JON POSTELs RFC REQUEST FOR COMMENTS - ETHICS >
        • DO THE ICANN-NOMINET NON-PROFIT DONATION MATH
        • ICANN . RFC Request For Comment
        • ICANN: PALESTINE COUNTRY CODE MEMO OF RULES
        • ICANN ASSIGNMENTS RFC 1060
        • PEOPLE WHO WORKED ON THE INTERNET RFC 1060
      • WIPO . CYBERSQUATTERS CAST THEIR VOTES
      • SANCTIONED BY THE U.S. BUT STILL DOING BUSINESS WITH ICANN
      • THE UNITED NATIONS, THE TALIBAN & THE IANA DECREE
      • GOOGLE is AMERICAs INTERNET ANTI-TRUST MONOPOLY SET UP TO BREAK DOWN THE WORLD
    • FCC . FTC .
    • RoC . USPTO Patents & Trademarks >
      • RACISM IS IN THE EYE OF THE USPTO EXAMINER:
    • SEC . FINRA . IP & ID +$ >
      • PRESIDENT OBAMA COMMUTATED LOW LEVEL CRIMINALS v WALL STREET NEVER JAILED
      • GIVE VIRGINIA FELONS RIGHT TO VOTE BECAUSE SEC "DISCIPLINED" (with no jail) KEEP THEIRs
      • WHY TRUMP SUPPORT OF FLORIDA AG PAM BONDI CONCERNS ME
      • HUSTLED BY FINRA OVER CLAIM OF DRS BEING FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT COMPLIANT
      • THE POLICY OF PUBLIC FINANCIALS
      • THE FAILURE OF SUCCESS
      • MADOFF DID NOT... FINRA/NASD DID
      • BILL H.R. 1098 >
        • TERESA GUIDICE WENT TO JAIL, 45 PAGES OF WALL STREET “OTHERS” DID NOT
        • PRESIDENT WILSON SIGNED A SECRET CALLED THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT…
        • DID GOVERNOR HOGAN PICK WHITE OVER LAW RIGHT IN THE ISSUE OF VOTES, CRIMES & FELONS?
        • SEC BARRING OF STEVEN A COHEN FOR 2 YRS IS PRIME EXAMPLE OF CONGRESSIONAL FIDUCIARY FAILURE LETTING WALL STREET WALK WHEN MAIN STREET GOES TO JAIL
        • YES KEVIN BACON, ELI WIESEL & OTHER HARMED INVESTORS, THERE ARE DEEP POCKETS... STILL >
          • & THIS BRAD PITT, ANSWERS YOU WHY THINGS AREN’T GOING TO CHANGE ON WALL STREET
        • SEC COMMENT: S7-18-15 >
          • THE SUPREMES GOT IT WRONG REJECTING BEBO v SEC
          • CLIFFNOTES ON FINRA, CONGRESS & DRS
        • OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE COMMENT: CONGRESS NEEDS TO SET “FIDUCIARY” DEFINITIONS ASIDE & PUT CONS THAT VIOLATE FIDUCIARY WHERE COPS CAN FIND THEM
        • A BIG DAY FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFOMR THA T CAME & WENT UNNOTICED
        • FINRA RUSH TO THWART INVESTIGATION BURYING FINRA DRS IN FINRA REGULATION >
          • IF THE SEC ACT CITED ANTI-COMPETITION THEN....
          • FINRA CONNED BROKERS BELIEVING FINRA GRANTED S.R.O. STATUS NOT THE S.E.C. OR DID THEY
          • GO FUND ME, FINRA >
            • FINRA FORCED ARBITRATION OF INVESTORS IS UNLAWFUL & NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW CONGRESS WROTE >
              • WHY FINRA WANTS TO HIDE FINRA DRS IN FINRA REGULATION
      • WHEN CRIMINAL JUSTICE WILL HAPPEN.... REALLY
      • CONGRESS CREATED MADOFF >
        • SEC: DISCLOSURE COMMENTS
    • IRS
    • KEEPING Your (C) EYE ON CONGRESS >
      • GOVDELIVERY.com EMAILINGS on 12 . 4
      • SENATE: Keep Tabs On Senate 2D IP . ID . (C) . Commerce & Disability
      • JUDICIARY : Keep Tabs On Judiciary 2D IP . ID . (C) & Commerce
      • ENERGY + COMMERCE : Keep Tabs On E&C 2D IP . ID . (C) & Commerce >
        • CASHING IN ON HEALTHCARE.gov CLICKS
        • Energy & Commerce (Patent Troll) PATTERN AND PRACTICE
      • STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND IMMUNITY IN COPYRIGHT
  • ARCHIVE(s)
    • ARCHIVES: FEBRUARY 2019 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVE: JANUARY 2019 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: DECEMBER (transferred 2018)
    • ARCHIVES: NOVEMBER 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: OCTOBER 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: SEPTEMBER 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: AUGUST (transferred) 2018
    • ARCHIVES: JULY (transferred) 2018
    • ARCHIVES: JUNE 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: MAY II 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: MAY I (Transfered) 2018
    • ARCHIVES: APRIL (Transferred) 2018
    • ARCHIVES: MARCH (Transferred) 2018
    • ARCHIVE: FEBRUARY (Transferred)2018
    • ARCHIVE: JANUARY 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVE: DECEMBER (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: NOVEMBER 2017 (transfered)
    • ARCHIVES: OCTOBER 2017
    • ARCHIVE: SEPTEMBER 2017
    • ARCHIVE: AUGUST 2017
    • ARCHIVE: JULY 2017
    • ARCHIVE: MAY 1/2017
    • ARCHIVE: APRIL 2017
    • ARCHIVE JANUARY 2017
    • ARCHIVE OCTOBER 2016
    • ARCHIVE AUGUST 2016
    • ARCHIVE JULY 2016
    • ARCHIVE MARCH 2016 -
    • ARCHIVE JANUARY 2016
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (a)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (b)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (b)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (c)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (d)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (e)
    • ARCHIIVE OCTOBER 2015
    • ARCHIVE JANUARY 2015
    • ARCHIVE AUGUST 2015
    • ARCHIVE * MAY 2014
    • ARCHIVE * MARCH 2014
    • ARCHIVE * JANUARY 2014
    • ARCHIVE 2013 - 6/2014
    • ARCHIVE 2013 >
      • ARCHIVE 2013 (a)
      • ARCHIVE 2013 (b)
      • ARCHIVE 2013 (c)
      • ARCHIVE 2013 (d)
Distinguished Toastmaster
BUSINESS & BRANDING COACH . LIFE & LEADERSHIP STRATEGIST MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKER SERVING ENTREPRENEURS &
MAIN STREET

RACISM IS IN THE EYE OF THE USPTO EXAMINER: THE SKINNY ON THE SLANTS: (c) Carrie Devorah
_____________________________________________________

The same week FENCES hit the theatres, it was announced THE SLANTS would be hitting the big time, facetime before the SUPREMES, the Supreme Court of the United States. The lawgivers are set to look down on a decision deciding if a band has the right to brand itself, ethnically.

A USPTO examiner said no.

Hmmmm. From where I sit? Racism is in the eye of the beholder, in this case, the USPTO examiner that ruled THE SLANTS is racist against Asians.

BUT THE SLANTS ARE ASIANS with no malice intended or taken by themselves or their fans, just, by a faceless examiner.
USPTO examiners are not nameless. Just faceless. One must do diligence and profile the examiner to grasp how the hell the USPTO has approved "n" words but not this band brand that calls it like they sees it themselves, so to speak.

Is the USPTO examiner Asian? Then off with their head and hands on this matter, possibly imprinting their own experiences in to a group of lovelies that hang to bang, sing and croon.

Does the USPTO examiner eat Chinese? OMG. Enough of a reason to cite them as murderous terroristic inclining S.O.B.s barred from ruminating over the validity of this claim?

Does the USPTO examiner vote Left, Right or down the middle or not at all? A left voting USPTO examiner on this matter then has a political tether to this issue that had Democrat legislators arm in arm marching for a moving news moment down Independence Avenue on the issue of the Redskins trademark? As I said to someone this evening, that was all about Dan. Dan Snyder someone became the bar mitzvah boy that grew in to a football team owner that everyone loves to beat up on. Dan has made it fun for malicious people in that Dan's legal beagles had no spine to say 'uh uh uh' to legislators who on the one hand craft bills against bullying then with the other hand march the median with a giant ceremonious gavel in hand.

Look, anyone who knows anything about anything knows the number one go to place for information is the Yellow Pages [ screen grab visible at www.centerforcopyrightintegrity.com ]. The Number two go to place for information is in the dictionaries [ screen grab visible at www.centerforcopyrightintegrity.com ],

"Slant | Define Slant at Dictionary.com
  1. www.dictionary.com/browse/slant
  2. Slant definition, to veer or angle away from a given level or line, especially from a horizontal; slope. See more.
Definition of slant intransitive verb
  1. 1 : to take a diagonal course, direction, or path
  2. 2 : to turn or incline from a right line or a level : slope
transitive verb
  1. 1 : to give an oblique or sloping direction to
  2. 2 : to interpret or present in line with a special interest : angle <stories slanted toward youth>; especially : to maliciously or dishonestly distort or falsify
slantingly
  1. play \ˈslan-tiŋ-lē\ adverb


Spokeo [ screen grab visible at www.centerforcopyrightintegrity.com ]

Yahoo [ screen grab visible at www.centerforcopyrightintegrity.com ]

Google [ screen grab visible at www.centerforcopyrightintegrity.com ]

Even Google images shows SLANT with out Asian pics. What the hell was the USPTO examiner thinking? And I do hope I get a piece of the take home cut the legal team representing THE SLANTS gets when they sue the USG, head of the USPTO and the examiner for racism, restraint of trade, mental anguish and a damn waste of taxpayer time when even Google images does not have Asians come to mind with the word, WORD, wordmark THE SLANTS [ https://www.google.com/search?q=slant&biw=1338&bih=637&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPq-G74KnRAhUmzoMKHV8jA9oQ_AUIBigB ]

With Slant in both the Yellow Pages (and White pages) and in the Dictionary then, I rest my case.... sue the damn examiner and stop activism from government employees who are supposed to put the staple in and pull the staple out- not legislate or regulate from a neutered agency allowed only to do what Congress's laws tell it to do, nothing more, like.... think racist interpretations.....
Besides with whois.com showing slants.com registered as a domain name, gTld in 1999 and theslants.com registered as a domain name, gTld in 2007, the USPTO decision is moot anyways, isnt it, after all, the internet purposed under the ICANN cartel to disrupt business, trademarks, copyrights and patents since 1998 (and unofficially sooner), then what is the agenda of the USPTO examiner anyways?
Give the band back their filing fees (and everyone else too) and pay their lawyers legal fees and the rest of us an apology for selling a product warranty that is out of it's protection purpose.....
And when bored? Go see FENCES. Count the "N" word..... you and I cant use, but in the name of Art? Hmmmm, isnt a band of Asians artists too?

Have a good one..................................................
 (C) Carrie Devorah [ applies to Relevant Text by Carrie & Design ]
. THE CENTER FOR COPYRIGHT INTEGRITY .
562 688 2883  .  carriedev@gmail.com 
 www.centerforcopyrightintegrity.com  
 
                                                                                                                                                                                  

EVERYTHING ON THIS SITE IS (C) CARRIE DEVORAH UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED even then its presentation & design is (c) Carrie Devorah
NOTHING MAY BE REPRODUCED . COPIED . WEBCRAWLER STOLEN . USED FOR ADVERTISING DOLLARS and so much more

WITHOUT WRITTEN LICENSE FROM CARRIE DEVORAH.