THE CENTER FOR COPYRIGHT INTEGRITY
  • HOME
    • IP DATA
    • ABOUT CARRIE DEVORAH
  • (C)OPYRIGHT UNIVER$ITY
    • LAWYERS WHO USE LAW AS A CUDGEL
  • COPY.RIGHTs
    • COPYRIGHTS ARE OFTEN WRONGED >
      • "HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU" DECISION SPELLS TROUBLE FOR ONLINERS CLAIMING PUBLIC DOMAIN AS THEIR OWN & PAIN FOR AUTHORS FIGHTING FOR THEIR BOOKS
      • HARPER LEE & THE MYSTERY OF HER NEWLY FOUND "GOLDEN GOOSE" TKAM
      • ENTREPRENEURSHIP ONLINE
      • TECHNOLOGY & LIFE >
        • POKEMON GO & CAMEL JOE ARE TWO OF A MARKETING KIND, almost
        • BILL COSBY, PEREZ HILTON, VENTURE CAPITALISTS & SAFE HARBOR
    • 2D IP (ARTS Intellectual Property) THEFT ONLINE >
      • SLAPP!!!!!!!!! SENATE CUFFS THE WRONG PEOPLE
      • SLATER'S SELFIE MONKEY SAGA
      • COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS 101
    • ID (Identity) THEFT Online >
      • STOP IDENTITY THEFT ONLINE BY INVOKING CA Civil Code 3344-6
    • RIGHT OF PUBLICITY...... >
      • ALL IS FAIR IN SOCIAL MEDIA TO HOLD INTENTIONAL TENANT FRAUDSTERS TO TASK
      • REDSKINS & ETIQUETTE
    • FAIR USE? NOT WHEN TECH TAKES YOUR $$$
    • CHAFFEE AMENDMENT IS NOT ABOUT STEALING ARTS-iSTs BLIND
    • TECHNOLOGY & Regulations
    • PRIVACY ONLINE SEDUCED THE GREAT REVEAL
    • SECURITY ONLINE & OFF IS NOT SECURE >
      • OUR TAKEAWAY POST THE SAN BERNARDINO DISABILITY CENTER MURDERSge
      • THOUGHTS ON KEEPING THE LIFE LIGHTS ON IN THE FACE OF TERRORISM
      • WHAT TO DEMAND OF RESPONDERS POST PARIS
      • WHY BAD TERRORISM THINGS WILL CONTINUE TO HAPPEN TO INNOCENT PEOPLE
  • COPYRIGHT LAW TALKs
    • THE WHITE HOUSE 2016
    • THE WHITE HOUSE 2015 (July) -
    • The BERNE CONVENTION : Where America Joined Late >
      • TITLE XVII : The Founding Fathers Promise Of Property Rights
      • THE FOUNDING FATHERS America's Original Inventors & Entrepreneurs
      • MAGNA CARTA The GRANDMOTHER Of IP
    • INTERNATIONAL.EU COPYRIGHT CONVERSATIONS >
      • 1939 GERMANY WALTER HALLSTEIN WARNED
      • THE ROYALS
      • THE UK GOVERNMENT ASKED FOR COMMENTS SO I COMMENTED
      • THE VATICAN & ITS NEW FINANCIAL OIG RENEE BRUHOLDT
      • UNITED NATIONS
      • CHINA: ERIX CHEN
    • ICANN . IANA . WIPO >
      • THE DISASTER IMMINENT POST IANA TAKEN AWAY FROM US TAXPAYERS WHO PAID FOR IT
      • THE EZUBAO STORY THAT IS THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’s PROBLEM & ICANNs
      • ICANN JON POSTELs RFC REQUEST FOR COMMENTS - ETHICS >
        • DO THE ICANN-NOMINET NON-PROFIT DONATION MATH
        • ICANN . RFC Request For Comment
        • ICANN: PALESTINE COUNTRY CODE MEMO OF RULES
        • ICANN ASSIGNMENTS RFC 1060
        • PEOPLE WHO WORKED ON THE INTERNET RFC 1060
      • WIPO . CYBERSQUATTERS CAST THEIR VOTES
      • SANCTIONED BY THE U.S. BUT STILL DOING BUSINESS WITH ICANN
      • THE UNITED NATIONS, THE TALIBAN & THE IANA DECREE
      • GOOGLE is AMERICAs INTERNET ANTI-TRUST MONOPOLY SET UP TO BREAK DOWN THE WORLD
    • FCC . FTC .
    • RoC . USPTO Patents & Trademarks >
      • RACISM IS IN THE EYE OF THE USPTO EXAMINER:
    • SEC . FINRA . IP & ID +$ >
      • PRESIDENT OBAMA COMMUTATED LOW LEVEL CRIMINALS v WALL STREET NEVER JAILED
      • GIVE VIRGINIA FELONS RIGHT TO VOTE BECAUSE SEC "DISCIPLINED" (with no jail) KEEP THEIRs
      • WHY TRUMP SUPPORT OF FLORIDA AG PAM BONDI CONCERNS ME
      • HUSTLED BY FINRA OVER CLAIM OF DRS BEING FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT COMPLIANT
      • THE POLICY OF PUBLIC FINANCIALS
      • THE FAILURE OF SUCCESS
      • MADOFF DID NOT... FINRA/NASD DID
      • BILL H.R. 1098 >
        • TERESA GUIDICE WENT TO JAIL, 45 PAGES OF WALL STREET “OTHERS” DID NOT
        • PRESIDENT WILSON SIGNED A SECRET CALLED THE FEDERAL RESERVE ACT…
        • DID GOVERNOR HOGAN PICK WHITE OVER LAW RIGHT IN THE ISSUE OF VOTES, CRIMES & FELONS?
        • SEC BARRING OF STEVEN A COHEN FOR 2 YRS IS PRIME EXAMPLE OF CONGRESSIONAL FIDUCIARY FAILURE LETTING WALL STREET WALK WHEN MAIN STREET GOES TO JAIL
        • YES KEVIN BACON, ELI WIESEL & OTHER HARMED INVESTORS, THERE ARE DEEP POCKETS... STILL >
          • & THIS BRAD PITT, ANSWERS YOU WHY THINGS AREN’T GOING TO CHANGE ON WALL STREET
        • SEC COMMENT: S7-18-15 >
          • THE SUPREMES GOT IT WRONG REJECTING BEBO v SEC
          • CLIFFNOTES ON FINRA, CONGRESS & DRS
        • OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE COMMENT: CONGRESS NEEDS TO SET “FIDUCIARY” DEFINITIONS ASIDE & PUT CONS THAT VIOLATE FIDUCIARY WHERE COPS CAN FIND THEM
        • A BIG DAY FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFOMR THA T CAME & WENT UNNOTICED
        • FINRA RUSH TO THWART INVESTIGATION BURYING FINRA DRS IN FINRA REGULATION >
          • IF THE SEC ACT CITED ANTI-COMPETITION THEN....
          • FINRA CONNED BROKERS BELIEVING FINRA GRANTED S.R.O. STATUS NOT THE S.E.C. OR DID THEY
          • GO FUND ME, FINRA >
            • FINRA FORCED ARBITRATION OF INVESTORS IS UNLAWFUL & NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW CONGRESS WROTE >
              • WHY FINRA WANTS TO HIDE FINRA DRS IN FINRA REGULATION
      • WHEN CRIMINAL JUSTICE WILL HAPPEN.... REALLY
      • CONGRESS CREATED MADOFF >
        • SEC: DISCLOSURE COMMENTS
    • IRS
    • KEEPING Your (C) EYE ON CONGRESS >
      • GOVDELIVERY.com EMAILINGS on 12 . 4
      • SENATE: Keep Tabs On Senate 2D IP . ID . (C) . Commerce & Disability
      • JUDICIARY : Keep Tabs On Judiciary 2D IP . ID . (C) & Commerce
      • ENERGY + COMMERCE : Keep Tabs On E&C 2D IP . ID . (C) & Commerce >
        • CASHING IN ON HEALTHCARE.gov CLICKS
        • Energy & Commerce (Patent Troll) PATTERN AND PRACTICE
      • STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND IMMUNITY IN COPYRIGHT
  • ARCHIVE(s)
    • ARCHIVES: SEPTEMBER 2019 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: AUGUST 2019 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVE JULY 2019 (transfered)
    • ARCHIVES: JUNE 2019 (transfer)
    • ARCHIVES: MAY (Transferred) 2019
    • ARCHIVES: APRIL 2019 (transfered)
    • ARCHIVES: MARCH 2019 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: FEBRUARY 2019 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVE: JANUARY 2019 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: DECEMBER (transferred 2018)
    • ARCHIVES: NOVEMBER 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: OCTOBER 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: SEPTEMBER 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: AUGUST (transferred) 2018
    • ARCHIVES: JULY (transferred) 2018
    • ARCHIVES: JUNE 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: MAY II 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: MAY I (Transfered) 2018
    • ARCHIVES: APRIL (Transferred) 2018
    • ARCHIVES: MARCH (Transferred) 2018
    • ARCHIVE: FEBRUARY (Transferred)2018
    • ARCHIVE: JANUARY 2018 (transferred)
    • ARCHIVE: DECEMBER (transferred)
    • ARCHIVES: NOVEMBER 2017 (transfered)
    • ARCHIVES: OCTOBER 2017
    • ARCHIVE: SEPTEMBER 2017
    • ARCHIVE: AUGUST 2017
    • ARCHIVE: JULY 2017
    • ARCHIVE: MAY 1/2017
    • ARCHIVE: APRIL 2017
    • ARCHIVE JANUARY 2017
    • ARCHIVE OCTOBER 2016
    • ARCHIVE AUGUST 2016
    • ARCHIVE JULY 2016
    • ARCHIVE MARCH 2016 -
    • ARCHIVE JANUARY 2016
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (a)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (b)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (b)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (c)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (d)
    • ARCHIVE JUNE 2014 (e)
    • ARCHIIVE OCTOBER 2015
    • ARCHIVE JANUARY 2015
    • ARCHIVE AUGUST 2015
    • ARCHIVE * MAY 2014
    • ARCHIVE * MARCH 2014
    • ARCHIVE * JANUARY 2014
    • ARCHIVE 2013 - 6/2014
    • ARCHIVE 2013 >
      • ARCHIVE 2013 (a)
      • ARCHIVE 2013 (b)
      • ARCHIVE 2013 (c)
      • ARCHIVE 2013 (d)
Distinguished Toastmaster
BUSINESS & BRANDING COACH . LIFE & LEADERSHIP STRATEGIST MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKER SERVING ENTREPRENEURS &
MAIN STREET

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Several Typical Fee Items Subject To Customs Duty in Equipment Import Contract  Reprinted With Permission Of EREX CHEN:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 In international trade, transaction relating to equipment import to China occurs frequently. The seller and the buyer will spend substantial time in negotiating the commercial terms and conditions, but seldom consider the setting of various fee items which may probably bring influence over the customs duty to be imposed. As a result,  after the contract is concluded, some unforeseeable customs duty may be imposed during the import process which inevitably brings inconvenience and loss to both the seller and the buyer.

Therefore, it is important to understand the basic knowledge of the customs duty in relation to the equipment import. In this article, we will discuss several fee items
involved in equipment import which are relevant to customs duty.

I. Typical fee items in equipment import contract
In a sales contract for equipment import into China, besides the price of the equipment itself, other related fee items may include:

1. Commission

2. Cost of transportation and insurance

3. Special design fee

4. Royalty fee

5. Equipment installation and commissioning fee

6. Technology service fee (technology training fee)

7. Warranty fee

8. Packaging material fee

9. Cost of spare parts for replacement, as well as maintenance and test fee

II. The definition and scope of customs dutiable value for import equipment
The dutiable value of the equipment for import, besides the transaction value of the equipment itself, the above-mentioned fee items may or may not be included into the scope of the dutiable value. The detailed analysis is as below:

1. Commission
In equipment import contract, if a purchase commission payable by the buyer exists, such commission will not be included into the scope of dutiable value. However, other commission or brokerage except purchase commission payable by the buyer shall be part of the dutiable value.

2. Cost of transportation and insurance
All costs of transportation and insurance incurred prior to the arrival of the equipment in designated China port shall be part of the dutiable value. Costs of transportation and insurance incurred after the arrival shall be excluded in the dutiable value.

3. Special design fee
Most of the equipments for import are designed according to special requirements of the buyer. Thus, if the buyer pays special design fee or R&D fee accordingly, such fees will be included into the dutiable value.

4. Royalty fee
Royalty fee refers to the fee payable by the buyer to the seller or IP holders for the license of patent, trademark, know-how, copyright or distributorship in relation to the equipment. Royalty fee shall be included into the dutiable value. However, if the royalty fee is not related to the equipment, or the payment of the royalty fee does not constitute the condition for sale of the equipment to China, such royalty fee shall not be part of the dutiable value.

The following three points shall be taken into consideration in determining whether the royalty fee shall be included into the dutiable value:
(1) The royalty fee is not included in the transaction value of the equipment;
(2) The royalty fee is related to the equipment itself;
(3) The payment of the royalty fee constitutes the condition for sale of the equipment to China. The payment of the royalty fee shall be deemed to constitute condition for sale of the equipment to China if (i) the buyer fails to pay the royalty fee, then the buyer will not be allowed to import the equipment, or (ii) the buyer fails to pay the royalty fee, the equipment cannot be purchased with the conditions as agreed in the contract.

The royalty fee, depending on the negotiation, will be probably paid with a fixed rate,
or an agreed % based on the business profit. Once the royalty fee is determined, the
customs duty in relation to the royalty fee will be determined according to the duty rate of the equipment.

5. Equipment installation and commissioning fee
Equipment installation and commissioning fee refers to the fee incurred due to the installation and commissioning in relation to the equipment at the place of the buyer or relevant party after the equipment is delivered in China. Such fee, according to the law, shall not be included in the dutiable value.

6. Technology service fee (Technology training fee)
Technology service fee (Technology training fee) refers to the fee payable by the buyer for the technology training service provided by the seller towards the buyer’s workers. Such fee shall not be included in the dutiable value.

7. Warranty fee
Any warranty fee relating to the equipment shall be included in the dutiable value.

8. Packaging material fee
Any packaging material fee payable by the buyer which is separately listed and related to the equipment shall be included in the dutiable value.

9. Cost of spare parts for replacement, as well as maintenance and test fee Any cost for spare parts for replacement, as well as maintenance and test fee incurred
after the import of the equipment, shall not be included in the dutiable value. However, if such fees have been already included in the transaction value of the
equipment, then they will be subject to customs duty because they are not separately

III. Our suggestions
In consideration of the fee items as discussed above, some fee items will be included in the dutiable value while the others can be excluded. Therefore, during the course of contract drafting and negotiation, we suggest the followings shall be noted:

1. Those fee items which can be excluded in the dutiable value shall be fully understood. In above-mentioned fee items, the purchase commission, cost of transportation and insurance incurred after the arrival of the equipment in designated China port, royalty fee with no relation to the equipment, equipment installation and commissioning fee, technology service fee (technology training fee), cost of spare parts for replacement, as well as maintenance and test fee will be excluded in the dutiable value.

2. Any fee items which can be excluded in the dutiable value and exist in the purchase of the equipment, such fee items shall be separately listed in the contract
in an explicit way. Otherwise, the fees under these fee items will be deemed part of the transaction value and subject to customs duty because they are not
separately listed.

This article is published solely for the interest of friends and clients and should not be relied upon as the legal advice of any kind from us. Should you have any questions about this article, please contact the partner of Mylink Law Office.

Contact Person:
Erex Chen, Managing Partner
Tel:+86-21-68556511
Email:[email protected]
Website: www.mylinklaw.com

 (C) Carrie Devorah [ applies to Relevant Text by Carrie & Design ]
. THE CENTER FOR COPYRIGHT INTEGRITY .
562 688 2883  .  [email protected] 
 www.centerforcopyrightintegrity.com  
 
                                                                                                                                                                                  

EVERYTHING ON THIS SITE IS (C) CARRIE DEVORAH UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED even then its presentation & design is (c) Carrie Devorah
NOTHING MAY BE REPRODUCED . COPIED . WEBCRAWLER STOLEN . USED FOR ADVERTISING DOLLARS and so much more

WITHOUT WRITTEN LICENSE FROM CARRIE DEVORAH.