Distinguished Toastmaster
BUSINESS & BRANDING COACH . LIFE & LEADERSHIP STRATEGIST MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKER SERVING ENTREPRENEURS &
MAIN STREET

COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS 101    [ You Are On This CLICKs Page ]

________________________________________________________
"IDIOT PROOF" ILLUSTRATIONS OF HOW SEARCH ENGINES & SAFE HARBOR WERE DESIGNED FOR SEARCH ENGINES & ISPs TO AVOID PAYING INCOME TO 2D ARTS IP TO CREATORS & LET USERS OF THE SEARCH ENGINES & ISPs BE FOUND LIABLE FOR INFRINGEMENT  (c) Carrie Devorah :
________________________________________________________

Unauthorized Use of my Jonas Brother photo

Tutorials are best understood when illustrated. In the spirit of One Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words, here are some Idiot Proof illustrations of what is NOT Fair Use and NOT Safe Harbor. The Visual Tutorial is made up of REAL examples of Unauthorized Use of  MY 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property).

IDIOT PROOF is a marketing term not an insult. IDIOT PROOF describes an 'in your face' style of presentation/pitch showing a prospective Customer EXACTLY what the Marketer wants seen giving the Customer a No Surprise picture of what they are getting. If a Marketer wants the Customer to see the chair in a room, the Marketer's photograph is a close up on the chair so the chair is seen, not a broad shot of the room the Chair gets visually lost in.

BY the time you finish looking at ALL the thefts of my IP that I am aware of to date, you will have the argument as to WHY Small Claims court can never ever  work for me toward adressing the Thefts of my 2D(dimensionsal) ARTS IP(intellectual property). What I need Congress and the Senate and foreign legislators to do, is to put a cork in the Legislative Leaks that allow these abuses to propugate... EXPONENTIALLY and Algorithmically!

I am a Royalties girl. My 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property) are my employees. I create an ARTS work. My 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property) are shown in multiple abuses through multiple sites, on multiple Search Engines and ISPs.

I have showing you, below, examples of Unauthorized Use of MY 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property), used in Violations of FAIR USE, SAFE HARBOR and RIGHT TO PUBLICITY in Violations of Title XVII, elements of Title XVIII and potential violations of RICO.
1- I own all my copyrights
2- Unless images designated to my Agency, I am the ONLY person allowed to decide where my images go and for how much. That said, I own all MY Copyrights
3- No one has the right to use my name, my photo without my permission. Using my name, my photo without my permission is in violation of MY Right To Publicity, impacting my equity, my goodwill and my investment into my equity, my craft and my skill
4- No one uses My Copyrights and/or my name without compensation and without a License Agreement detailing my Terms of Use. It has been that way since 1978, the year I graduated Pratt and began my Design Studio.

A quick Recap of Fair Use, Safe Harbor and Right To Publicity before we start:
Fair Use
Fair Use are four benchmarks used to determine the possibility for using a 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property). The WHOLE of the 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property) cannot be used. Just a portion, if permission is given. HE 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property) CANNOT IMPACT The ARTS Owners ability to make Commerce from their IP. As my grandmother from Poland would say talking about Men, Sex and Dating. Why would anyone want to buy milk if the Cow gave it away for Free?

Safe Harbor
Safe Harbor is a Legal Defense used in all kinds of Industry to guard THAT business entity from being sued. Umm, imagine a Moat around a Castle. Safe Harbor is the Moat, so to speak. Safe Harbor has been adopted by Technology Search Engines and ISPs (and others) as a defense to avoid being sued by 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property) ARTS owners whose ARTs Works are shared, as Files or Images, by the User. The Tech Companies protest Clean Hands claiming they arent the actual 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property) ARTS theives, all their Search Engines and ISPs do is provide the Vehicle or Forum the User is in.
 File - Image? Tomato or tomatoe. The behaviour is exactly the same. Taking what isnt yours is Stealing. Sharing or Distributing what isnt yours means your are the Fence. A mentor taught me 'You cant be a little bit pregnant." Being the Search Engine or ISP to a User File-Image sharing is like giving the Thieves the guns, driving the Get Away Car and then taking a piece of the back end or acting as the Pawn Shop for the User.

Right To Publicity
Right To Publicity is using my images without my Copyright and/or my hybrid signature of my Agency not showing in Search Engine Galleries, or, in cases, putting their watermark on my Image, misleading the Public to think the image is (i) theirs or (ii) used with my permission to them
               
Here we go... on a Real Time visual tutorial showcasing actual incidents of these Abuses, oh, and How my Images were made into Orphans and why Small Claims Court is not an option considering the quantity of Thefts I am showing you here on this page. As the expression goes, "This ain't the Half of Them" showing you my career would be spent in Court NOT doing what I love most- making beautiful Works.

I am forced to routinely troll the Internet to see if there are new Abuses of my Copyright I will find. As Technology has been taking over, I find exponential Abuses. Daily. It is a Time Vaccum, exhausting and emotionally defeating. Financially? A lost game unless Congress wakes up to the living ARTS hell, Congress has legislated.

EXAMPLE 1 : FLICKR
Location: Sansome Street San Francisco CA
Zipcode: http://www.glotter.com/entry-2385
Website: www.flickr.com
Congressman: Nancy Pelosi (D)  http://pelosi.house.gov/
Senator: Dianne Feinstein (D) http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/

I took this image of the Jonas Brothers. I found  MY photo on jb's Flickr page. JB lists my name. JB does NOT list my Copyright or my Agency's requirement the photo state (c) Carrie Devorah/Wenn. Each photo I took and released had MY photo details. My details have been scrubbed from my photo. I know because I looked at the image here in Photoshop, the program I used to load my Image details in with. Removal of my Copyright from MY photo neutered MY photo in to what the Copyright Office calls, an Orphan. Orphan Images is the newest Intellectual Property commodity the Copyright Office is seeking Congress to legislate. Why? More money for the Agency. The Orphan Works initiative is being pushed by Technology companies who want access to the photos without a legal obligation for permission from the Owner. Sort of like a photo you find on the streets except this photo wasnt in the street. It was in your book locker, removed so that it looks like it was lost and found by you, able to be used without payment. It is important to note that Orphan Works flies in the face of the Berne Convention. Berne Convention states, basically, a Copyright owner does not have to mark their image with a signature or copyright notice. Difference is, in Technology, photographers signatures are hidden or embedded for other photographers or editors to see. Technology? Removing all that data so the Image gives the appearance of belonging to no one... like my Jonas Brother photo that had the Signature removed, before being posted to the Yahoo! site, Flickr, and that jb told me he took my photo. Giving me credit? No sir. Give me payment too... 

---

EXAMPLE 2 : SPOKEO
Location: 556 South Fair Oaks Avenue Pasadena California
Zipcode: 91105
Website: www.spokeo.com
Congressman: Adam Schiff  http://schiff.house.gov/
Congressman: Judy Chu  http://chu.house.gov/
Senator: Barbara Boxer http://www.boxer.senate.gov/

Spokeo is a Data Aggregator. The site collects data on people, bundles the data, then lets the world know in resulting online searches, they have data on you, me, and even Legislators like Fred Upton and Judy Chu, both on the Judiciary Committee in Congress.

The photos of Fred and Ed and Judy? The photos belong to the photographer. The story bits and pieces? A little bit too much text to pass as Fair Use.. the stories belong to the Authors or sites. The details of the Legislators private lives? Well, some are of the opinion because the Fred and Judy are legislators means they are public domain. No. That is a wrong assumption. Whether Judy or Fred's politics are liked or not, politicians are people too. Being in the public eye is not a waiver to Right To Publicity, a stature enjoyed by every day people, celebrities and yes, politicians. Former VP candidate Sarah Palin took the leap of trademarking her families names as an aggressive step to defend the family from Domain Squatters and Trademark Tramps from stamping all over her family's name and character, a step far off the grid from what a typical politician will do... which is nothing, assuming because they are in public office, so is their name. No.

Sites like Spokeo.com, 123people.com, and other sites are Human Trafficking in the electronic age and Interstate, internationally in violation of RICO and into the realm of Interpol, international law enforcement. A person's life that is gathered, bundled then sold to persons who want more than the typical cursory look at a politicians life, photos, articles puts the person's life in danger. People under orders of protection are being located then hunted down by stalkers. These sites are giving Identity Thieves data usable to steal a person's identity including someone who wants to pretend he is Fred Upton- Congressional seal and all.

---

EXAMPLE 3 : SPOKEO
Location: Pasadena California
Zipcode: 91105
Website: www.spokeo.com
Congressman: Adam Schiff  http://schiff.house.gov/
Congressman: Judy Chu  http://chu.house.gov/
Senator: Barbara Boxer http://www.boxer.senate.gov/

As are Congressman Judy Chu and Fred Upton's lives all over the Internet on bundling sites just like Spokeo, every other member of the Judiciary, has their data being gathered, bundled then sold for data and/or profited from by advertisers and by investors in these ventures.

Some of these sites are domestic grown. Others of these sites, such as 123people.com are European based where a different set of rules apply to ID and Identity Theft, Human Trafficking and Fraud. The Search on Ms. Chu produced local results. The Search did not produce Hits on Ms Chu on Search Engines in countries that do not display here in America.

I spoke with FTC's Julie Brill at an event at WAPO months back. We spoke about Spokeo and other sites like 123people.com Ms. Brill knew about spokeo.com the site Fred Upton and Judy Chu's paste up was created from. Julie told me the FTC was taking steps. But Julie did not know about 123people.com nor of other sites I mentioned in the course of our speaking. Why? Easy enough for me to explain. As an owner of my Copyrights, Image and other Rights bundled with marketing and managing of 2D(dimensional) IP Intellectual Property for my livelihood, a good part of a day is spent researching my name on line on multiple Search Engines to see the newest place my name and/or work is appearing without my permission or fee or license contract.

These sites morph, constantly, looking for business models that will turn a profit past their original seed money or Venture Capital. Wikipedia indicates Spokeo.com, headquartered in Pasadena California was founded by Harrison Tang in 2006. Of value to read is the description of spokeo.com on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo) Spokeo was fined by the FTC, July 2012,"for collecting details about people’s lives and selling them to would-be employers without protecting those individuals’ privacy." Spokeo is required to submit compliance reports to the FTC for twenty years.

Spokeo, these days, is paying commissions  http://www.spokeoaffiliates.com/faq  People sign up to become an affiliate. Drive traffic. 75% commision and 60 days of cookies on a site. Neat model, unless you are the person being sold.

It is a matter of time that Spokeo will be pursued legally for putting their watermark on Copyright Owners photos in addition for aggregating 2D ARTS creatives IP bundled then sold through the site. Spokeo has " Spokeo also has the the largest online database of celebrity photos such as Angelina Jolie, Justin Bieber, Mila Kunis, etc." my bread and buttuer. Spokeo has an Affiliates program offering Internet users, and others, an opportunity to earn income for driving Traffic to the site. It is a slam dunk No Brainer that Spokeo and sites like it should be paying the 2D ARTS IP Owners for the 2D ARTS IP site users would be coming to Spokeo for. Hmmm, is someone going to Spokeo to meet Joe Blow OR for my photos of Angelina Jolie and other of my celebrity subjects I have had the honor to photograph but dishonored with constant theft facilicate by online ISPs and Search Engine providers.

---

EXAMPLE 4 : PHOTOSHELTER
Location: 33 Union Square West New York, NY
Zipcode: 10003
Website: www.photoshelter.com
Congressman: Jerold Nadler http://nadler.house.gov/
Congressman: Carolyn Maloney  http://maloney.house.gov/
Senator: Kirsten Gillibrand  www.gillibrand.senate.gov/contact/
Senator: Chuck Schumer   www.schumer.senate.gov/

Photoshelter is a lesson in the value of making phone calls first upon discovering Unauthorized Use of ARTS Works images on line, in this case, my name and my name as (c) Carrie Devorah. This Unauthorized Use of my name is a Lemonade Lesson. A Lemonade Lesson? You know. What you do when Life deals you a Lemonade.... try to make something positive of it.

I did not authorize use of my name related to the site. The site CEO indicated my name was linked to the site since 2010, for three years. As indicated in the Spokeo Example, Spokeo aggregates and sells personal information. As is my email adress is well known as am I. Anything is possible including someone opening up a gallery that sat empty for three years. The value of the empty gallery? It gives the impression I am a member of the site; My name at the site shows up in response to online searches of my name, bringing people to the site; my name is a +1 in terms of the 70000 members the site indicates it has which is good for bringing on board advertisers. The use, however it happened is a violation of my Right To Publicity, a use of my ID.

I found it honorable that the second go round of calls and emails to the site, the CEO took my call. I like their product I like that the CEO removed my name, as simple as that. The walk away from this might be a Win Win for myself and photoshelter. The concept has merit for newbies. And I like to mentor new artists and photographers. We shall see... Sometimes friendship and the opportunity to mentor the next generation of the Business of the ARTS Biz... price tag? Priceless.....

The paste up is a representation of what Fair Use is- using data from a site but NOT in a way that alters the value of the Image or Identity. The (c) Carrie Devorah? Well, that has a heft price tag that has come with it over the decades.

---

EXAMPLE 5 : YUMPU     i-Magazine AG
Location: Moosackerstraße 17
Diepoldsau, Schweiz 9444    +49 (0)89 41 61 70 20
Website: www.i-magazine.de   http://www.yumpu.com/en/info/agb
info@i-magazine.de
Legislators: German Embassy

Yumpu has got brass 'ones' of a giant size. The German based imag removed my Orphan Works comment from the Register of Copyrights site, posted in and around February 2013.  The absolute gall of this international entity to poach the Internet, scavenging clearly stated clearly marked 2D ARTS IP with directive 'My comment is clearly marked with MAY BE USED ONLY UNDER LICENSE. Yumpu states on their site their fees for using the data and for how long. Excuse me! That is my data. Yumpu's Theft of my IP might also be called Piracy. Bottom line, they are the same behaviour- theft, the only difference being Piracy is the buzz term around Congress, Legislators and Law Enforcement invoking images of swashbucklers with wooden legs and eye patches. I can tell you exactly where I would put my peg leg if I got hold of Yumpu but that is a problem in an Internet world unless legislators get their game on and get the Search Engines and ISPs to collapse these entities behaving in violation of Treaties between America and, in the case of Yumpu, Germany. Its not rocket science to figure out the extent of the International theft here. Search Yumpu. What the hits. Count the hits... profitable business model or not makes no difference to an IP owner and the person whose name is being sold internationally. As for the Register of Copyrights? Geez louise, Maria. Walk the walk, just dont talk the talk. You are on notice your agency file shared data. What are you going to do about it and Yumpu and others of that model now that you know you participated, knowingly or not in file sharing on line....?

EXAMPLE 6 : THE FREE LIBRARY BY FARLEX
Location: Huntingdon Valley PA USA
Zipcode: 19006 
Website: www.thefreelibrary.com
Congressman: Mike Fitzpatrick http://fitzpatrick.house.gov/
Congressman:  Allyson Schwartz http://schwartz.house.gov/
Senator:  Robert Casey Jr www.casey.senate.gov/
Senator:  Pat Toomey  www.toomey.senate.gov/

I found the FARLEX online posting of a Horse slaughter article I wrote for the Racing Post, back in 2001, while I was based in Europe covering International Horseracing. Imagine my surprise, during one of my routine online searches to see how my name and/or images are being used, to discover my 2001 Racing Post article online on this site called Free Library.

My experience in writing Take-Down letters, letters telling the company to take the article down is a waste of time. That said, one never knows what type of a wackadoodle the recipient is OR where else the letter will end up... like on Chilling Effects, example posted below. Google forwarded on, the Take-Down letter I wrote them, to Chilling Effects who posted the article dedacted with a ton of trackable data, dedacted enough for a nefarious person to put details on me together for ID theft and/or abuse.  FREE LIBRARY is  cashing in on my IP, intellectual Property, despite the Copyright notice and Cautions against Unauthorized Use that Farlex published... "Copyright 2001 MGN Ltd. No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express permission from the copyright holder. Copyright 2001 Gale, Cengage Learning, All Rights Reserved."

The Free Library by Farlex writes "There is a $10,000 minimum. We do not accept adress for adult products and services or suggestive ads for any services. We reserve the right to reject any advertiser or ad." The unknown is how much money was earned from that article... released on the Internet over 12 years after it was first written.

---

CHILLING EFFECTS

EXAMPLE 7: Chilling Effects
Location: 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco CA
Zip Code: 94110-1914Z
Website: www.chillingeffects.org
Congressman:
Congressman:
Senator: Dianne Feinstein  www.feinstein.senate.gov

Traffic on non profit Chilling Effects Clearinghouse increased so dramatically the site that it needed to close. Amazing.

I came to Chilling Effect site, during one of my online sweeps for Unauthorized Use of my Copyrighted Images and Intellectual Property and name. The letter I sent Google is to the right. Please note, under the date it states the letter was 'private'... yet it is on the Internet. This is a private correspondence that Google released without my knowledge or permission and CLEARLY not with my approval of becoming a commodity profited from by Chilling Effects a

collaboration of law school clinics, across state lines, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation. Chillinghouse states it "aims to support lawful online activity against the chill of unwarranted legal threats." This was a warranted take down notice. Would I ever put a Take-Down notice in to writing again? NEVER Google violated my IP, the letter I wrotethem. Instead, I will post my complaints online to build a community of like minded IP creators tired of being fodder for other people's 'business models.'

EXAMPLE 8 : AMAZON.com Inc
Location: 1200 12th Ave. South, Ste. 1200
Seattle, WA
Zipcode: 98144-2734
Website: www.amazon.com
Congressman: Adam Smith  http://adamsmith.house.gov/
Senator: Patty Murray  www.murray.senate.gov/‎
Senator: Maria Cantwell   www.cantwell.senate.gov/‎

The Amicus Brief from the landmark Supreme Court case was a freebie handout distributed the morning the "Supremes" heard the matter of Texas defending its right to keep its Ten Commandments on the Courthouse grounds. I had been asked to loan a selection of my photos to Texas Governor Rick Perry's team. In the course of a routine patrol on line to see where my images and or name appears I came to this link on Amazon.com. Let me repeat, it was my search of my name that brought me to this link of the folios being sold on Amazon. My name was part of the TAGs, the words listed for Search Engine Algorithms to find to exponentially increase their market exposure.

I own my Copyright, my images and my Right To Publicity. I picked up the phone to speak with the publisher. He was shocked to learn the Brief was being sold online. Me with it. NOT cool for either me or the publisher...

---

EXAMPLE 9 : MyLife.com
Location: Westwood, California USA
Zip: 90025
Website: www.mylife.com
Congressman: Henry Waxman  http://waxman.house.gov/
Congressman: Karen Bass   http://bass.house.gov/
Senator: Dianne Feinstein   www.feinstein.senate.gov

Mylife.com boasts on its home page that it has over "..over 700M profiles quickly to find personal and professional contacts you can't find elsewhere, plus organize all your connections in one place to get up-to-date information and alerts for everyone that matters." Further down the page, it states it has "600M profiles." Seems someone cant count.
It appears many of the profiles are not of users but of individuals like me who are trafficked online from data aggregated online from the Wild West of the Internet when people jumped on the bandwagon of wanting to become a paperless society, wasnt that the pitch. Turns out, paperless wasnt paperless at all but what is real and scary is the pace at which all over our private data is released on line then gathered and used as bait and switch to get people to use a site or think others are using a site... sort of like Jacob working seven years to get one sister for marriage, gets the wrong one and has to go back to work seven more years for the one he wants.

MyLife states "We never share your information without your permission." That is incorrect. Mylife does NOT have my permission to share my information OR my name. I own my Right To Publicity. Oh, MyLife state it "is not a Consumer Reporting Agency (CRA) as defined by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)." I have a sense that is something to do with the Spokeo.com decisions brought by the FTC.

---

EXAMPLE 10 : Pepple.com
Location: Unknown
Website: www.pepple.com
Congressman: Unknown
Senator: Unknown

Pepple.com is an empty site that bears a site Copyright date of 2006-2009 and some email adresses. The impression is the site is dormant. The fact is my name turns up on pepple.com in a routine search of Unauthorized Uses of my name

PEPPLE.com

EXAMPLE 12 : Aol.com
Location: 770 Broadway New York, NY
Zipcode: 10003
Website: www.aol.com
Congressman: Jerold Nadler http://nadler.house.gov/
Congressman: Carolyn Maloney  http://maloney.house.gov/
Senator: Kirsten Gillibrand  www.gillibrand.senate.gov 
Senator: Chuck Schumer   www.schumer.senate.gov

AOL.com

YATEDO.com

EXAMPLE 15: YATEDO.com
Location: 103 Rue La Boetie
              Paris
Zipcode: 750008 France
Website: www.yatedo.com
YATEDO's model is to offer people the opportunity to claim Ownership to their Aggregated Name and if the person doesn't want to claim Ownership to their Aggregated Name then YATEDO offers the person the opportunity to CLICK in and Delete their profile. By doing so the Person whose Identity has been compromised shows the Aggregator they are in fact a real person with an Email Adress that has been collected, now available to sell. The CLICK in is a trick to collect Email Adresses along with personal data

EXAMPLE 11 : Myspace.com
Location: 407 North Maple Drive, Beverly Hills CA
              1223 Wilshire Blvd.,Ste. 402 Santa Monica Zipcode: 90403
Website:  www.myspace.com
Congressman: Henry Waxman www.waxman.house.gov
Senator: Dianne Feinstein  www.feinstein.senate.gov

Getting myself ready to meet JT, Justin Timberlake in that the social networking service Myspace.com is owned by JT and  Specific Media LLC/ Myspace was launched in August 2003 and is headquartered in Beverly Hills, California

MYSPACE.com

EXAMPLE 13 : Baidu.com
Location: IR Department  Baidu Campus,
No. 10, Shangdi 10th Street,
Haidian District,  Beijing
Zipcode: 100085
Website: www.baidu.com
Phone: +86.10.5992.8888
Fax: +86.10.5992.0000
E-mail: ir@baidu.com
Congressman/Senator: Chinese Embassy
                                Peoples Republic of China

BAIDU.com

GMAIL (dot)EDU SCAM

EXAMPLE 16: An emerging trend in GMAIL scams are (dot)edu adresses appearing as the sender's adress along with a college in this case GWU and UIowa

EXAMPLE 18 : BING
Location: 1 Microsoft Way Redmond, WA c
Zipcode: 98052
Website: www.bing.com
Congressman: Suzanne Delbene www.delbene.house.gov
Congressman: David Reichert www.reichert.house.gov
Senator: Patty Murray http://murray.senate.gov
Senator: Maria Cantwell http://cantwell.senate.gov

BING

Thousands of my images appear without Authorization on Bing in galleries similar to the Unauthorized galleries of my images on Aol, Yahoo, Baidu, Google, etc. What is interesting to note the Algorithms for poaching 2D(dimensional) IP(intellectual property) appear to be operating faster retrieving data faster. ALSO retrieving images that I have
defaced emblazoning my (c) Carrie

 Devorah May Be Used Only Under License too.... love it

GOOGLE +

EXAMPLE 19 : Google Inc
Location: 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy  Mountain View CA Zipcode:  94043
Website: www.google.com
Congressman: Mike Honda  http://honda.house.gov/
Congressman: Ann Eshoo   http://eshoo.house.gov/
Senator: Dianne Feinstein  www.feinstein.senate.gov

Cant you see it? It is as plain as the 72dpi nose on your face...the words SHARED PRIVATELY!!!! I knew it when I saw my Cupcake photo on the Internet something was very very wrong. The photo was taken with my iPhone in the Gristedes in NYC then emailed to myself. END OF STORY. I used to blog about cupcakes. Yes!!!! I do know the Holy Grail of Cupcakes (here in DC. No it is not Georgetown.) I loved the artistry of this sweet treat.

I had no expectations when I went online to do a routine Sweep online for my name that I would find a PRIVATE EMAIL to myself online as a result in one of my online searches to see the newest Unauthorized Uses of  my emails.

Well if the Judge's decision of Google's StreetView being an invasion of privacy is the Handwriting on the Wall for google then I cannot wait....

U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh in San Jose, California allowed plaintiffs to refile their claim against Google rejecting the Google’s argument Google Users agree in the TOS to let Google intercept and read their e-mails

EXAMPLE 20 : YAHOO.com
Location: 701 First Avenue, Sunnyvale  CA
Zip: 94089-0703
Wesite: www.yahoo.com
Congressman: Mike Honda  www.honda.house.gov
Senator: Ann Eshoo  www.eshoo.house.gov

GOOGLE GALLERY

This is a Google gallery. Each invidual image is a photo I took that has appeared somewhere for payment licensed from my agency then was aggregated by Technology into a gallery of images (and articles) responsive to my name.

Initially, when a person searched they were given links that took them to the website where the data they were searching for is located. NOT these days. EACH of those images in the response to my search, over 4000 hits, is a separate violation of my Copyright, Unauthorized Use, a violation of my Right To Publicity and clearly NOT protected by either and both Fair Use and Safe Harbor.

There are THOUSANDS of my images in this gallery even some that I defaced with (c)Carrie Devorah written across them.... I cannot wait! I cannot wait....

YAHOO!s GALLERY OF THOUSANDS

Search result from searching "Carrie Devorah" images and Yahoo

The four printed pages are just a few of the over four thousand Unauthorized Uses of my images in a Yahoo! Thumbnail Gallery, a result of a search request of "Carrie Devorah images." There is no Copyright or other symbol stating these photos belong to me
and may only be used under license. The images are able to be

Search Result from Searching "carrie devorah images" on Yahoo.com

enlarged, still sharp and clear, to
the sized of small, medium, large,
violations of Title XVII Section 107. How can anyone make a living when their 2D(dimensional)
IP(intellectual property is given
away as you, partially, see here.the size of small, medium & large.

Just like with Google, I cannot wait... THOUSANDS of my Copyrighted Images online being used without my Authorization, in

Screen Grab showing Thumbnail Gallery result of a search for Carrie Devorah images. There is no Copyright or other symbol stating these photos belong to me and may only be used under license

Violation of Safe  Harbor, Fair Use and Right To Publicity

I noticed something.... profilers do that... we notice patterns. The images on Bing, Yahoo!, Aol, etc? Look awfully familiar. I cannot wait to figure out who else is in on this
orchestrated Theft of 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP (intellectual property)......

ANNA Nicole Smith

Anna Nicole Smith is one of those highly stolen photos. Smith showed up at the Supreme Court. No one knew who that kid was who stayed in the shot. We learned.....

It was her son who died tragically before she passed.

The image of Anna is in a round up of my images on a search Engine. As you can see when my cursor was put on the page, the image opened up larger showing who had secured a license to use the photo.

Abusively, and insulting, is the Disclaimer at the page bottom that
states "These photos may be
copyrighted..." THAT is not a

GOD IN THE TEMPLES OF
GOVERNMENT

disclaimer against Fair Use or Safe Harbor. THAT is an admission the Search Engine and ISP know what they are doing and hope to avoid culpability when the litigation hits.

The round up of images above is a partial result of a search of my name and "Moses." The search produced results from my God project. You can see the larger photo with attribution when the cursor was hovered. There is culpability here not absolution.

ABUSED COPYRIGHTS

This example is posted to show how photographers Copyrighted images are taken online then converted into photos that are insulting of the celebrity or politician.

IF legislators adressed the Unauthorized Use of Photos and artworks by anonymous and other entities by holding the Search Engines and ISPs aggregating and disseminating the IP for Users to use often also in Violation of the Wire Act, there is a good chance this insults to the Celeb or politician would be mitigated dramatically. Something about hitting people in their pockets to get a change in behaviour. As is? These abuses are a lawsuit waiting to happen....

_________________________________________________________
HOW TO MAKE AN ORPHAN WORK IN FIVE CLICKS OR LESS :
_________________________________________________________

IMAGE 1 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 4 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 2 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 5 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 3 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 6 (c) Carrie Devorah

Well maybe Six steps. I photographed Petraeus at a Capitol Hill hearing. Memorable day as usual on the Hill. My photos were transmitted to my agency. My agency then 'rents' my photos so to speak. We get paid for play UNTIL webcrawlers came along, search engines and ISPs and the fact that images were not locked to the Webpage by MSN. The picture was bundled/ aggregated in to a gallery using my name as the calling card. Search 'Carrie Devorah images' you get over 4000 Thumbnail hits of Images I have photographed in these endless Galleries presented on the Search engines (Image 2). Thumbnails have a commercial value. Thumbnails are used as Avators and Illustrations on websites. Image 4 shows how the "Thumbnail" Image became a larger 'in focus' size that can be reproduced from. You can see a black circle in Image 4's photo bottom right. That is a Gripper, showing where the cursor is as I 'gripped' the image to pull off out of the Gallery on to the Desktop where you can see how sharp and in focus the final image I have here for an illustration is for you to see how UNFAIR the Search Engine and ISPs claim of Fair Use is. These galleries of thousands of my images the Search Engines and ISPs facilitate Unknowns using without compensation to me is a violation of Fair Use which clearly states the Use of the Image cannot be at a loss of Commerce to the Property Owner. You decide. Really... you even had to THINK on this one?
My images are used commercially. I am entitled to a percentage of revenue earned by my images to attract advertising and investors dollars.

_________________________________________________________
STILL UNSURE HOW AN ORPHAN IMAGE IS MADE? LETs DO IT TOGETHER (c) Carrie Devorah :
_________________________________________________________

Gallery Page of Unauthorized Use. Sam Donaldson photo shows, cursor on the page, how the image is stolen

Sam Donaldson has been quite a staple around DC. Photographing Sam is less about photographing news, at times, and more like photographing a soon to be Presidential Medal Candidate. Not

Being asked about transferring the 'test' image of Sam Donaldson as to being sure I wanted to move it

Embed code shown after removing the 'photo' of Sam from the gallery to the desktop where it is used to print, etc. from

 a good sign most of the time in that most recipients are up there in age. You can clearly see how the

The Sam Donaldson photo about to be moved from the site to the desktop

The Sam Donaldson photo has been moved or removed without Authorization to my desktop. All identifying Copyright has been removed from my image that was stolen and used in violation of Fair Use and Safe Harbor

BING images are removable from the Gallery holding, last admitted count from bing AND that is not including Hidden Images? Topping over 4000 images 2D ARTS IP creators and owners like me are owed compensation for

JUST IN CASE ONE WANTS TO ARGUE LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OF IMAGES BEING COPYRIGHTED AS A DEFENSE OF Safe Harbor or Fair Use:

Google along with other Search Engines argues defense of Fair Use and Safe Harbor from claims against Users for removing 2D(dimensional) ARTS IP(intellectual property) from a google Image Gallery for use- personal or commercial. That argument is Moot in light of Google having a Pop-Up Disclaimer on the gallery Image Transformations from Small Click to Larger Clicks. The Disclaimer states "IMAGES MAYBE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT" which the Images were when Google or the other Search Engines and ISPs provided that Image to the User reinforcing that the Search Engine KNEW IN ADVANCE they may allows the image I shot of Lance Armstrong to be opened up into another size which can be reproduced from.  The offered menu of options to

open the image up to are be looped into a 2D ARTS IP Theft claim when they posted the Disclaimer alongside images that undergo transformation but into a presentation that continues to facilitate Theft of the Image and Theft of Commerce from the 2D (dimension) ARTS IP(intellectual property) Owner. GOOGLE IMAGES Small, Medium, Large and Actual Size. The disclaimer lower right says "Images may be subject to Copyright" as is the image on the left and all of the other of my images Google Gallery has created a wallpaper around including the example of Randy Travis, a popular image when Travis suffered personal issues in the public eye.

_________________________________________________________
HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF CORPORATE IDENTITY THEFT.... TWO CASES ACTUALLY- Laboutin & Dockside Grill Puente Gorda
(c) Carrie Devorah :
_________________________________________________________

IMAGE 1 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 4 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 2 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 5 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 3 (c) Carrie Devorah

IMAGE 6 (c) Carrie Devorah

This is an excellent example of Hijacking of a Person's website and the Brick site being abused by online Hackers fraudulently using the four mentioned credit cards to steal from the Puente Gorda Restaurant called Dockside Grill. Someone hacked my Facebook God In The Temples of Government website page removing me as Admin, inserting themselves to prevent me from closing them off the page.

Yes. Of course I filed an online complaint with Facebook. There is NO other way to file a complaint with facebook. They dont provide a brick adress, a click adress or a phone number. Clients are advised to go to drop downs to see if there is an answer for their question. There is a Report point but with the caveat you wont hear back from anyone, most likely. I never did hear back from Facebook even when I contacted someone I knew there.

I did contact the restaurant. The little old lady was sweet. She wanted to know why someone would post online orders for them when their business in mostly Walk-in. I did what I am trained to do, I escalated the matter to the Hotel leadership along with the Christian Laboutin people who, all, did nothing. The email adress someone assigned to the site is illustrated above right. NO. The page has not been taken down. How? And this is a perfect example of tourism dollars and constituent cash being diverted and taken, lost to regulatory oversite failure.

_________________________________________________________
GOOGLEs "STORY OF SEND" where Regulatory Agencies Have To Go To Get Hold Of Your Data That Lives Forever :
_________________________________________________________

THE TECHNOLOGY THAT KEEPS GOOGLE RUNNING : www.google.com/about/datacenters/gallery/#/all

SOME OF GOOGLES SITES : www.google.com/about/datacenters/gallery/#/tech  Douglas County . Georgia : St Ghislain . Belgium : The Dalles . Oregon :  Council Bluffs . Iowa : Lenoir . North Carolina : Hamina . Finland : Berkeley County . South Carolina : Mayes County . Oklahoma :

THE PEOPLE WHO KEEP THE DATA CENTERS RUNNING : www.google.com/about/datacenters/gallery/#/people

A ROCKSTAR
AGAINST
IP & ID ABUSE BY
TECHNOLOGY

_________________
WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN
____________________

__________________
Capitol Hill Switchboard
(202) 224 3121 _____________________

WRITE YOUR
SENATOR
__________________

__________________
KNOW YOUR CONGRESSMAN OR
SENATOR
?
SEARCH BY ZIPCODE
__________________

Create
The 2D ARTS IP
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
PROTECTION
ACT
FOR
TREASURED
HEIRLOOM
ARTS
LEGACY
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
PROTECTION
SIGN THE PETITION

______________

__________________
TELL HERE HOW COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT HURT YOU ______________

HONORING THOSE WHO GAVE THEIR ALL
SO WE MIGHT HAVE OUR
PROPERTY RIGHTS
THANK YOU
 

________________
 
THE BIG & THE SMALL of BIZ

Small Business >100
Firms                     5.64 million
Employing           39.13 million
Annual Payroll     $1.44 trillion

Big Business  <100
Firms                            99.009
Employing           72.84 million
Annual Payroll      $3.5 million
________________

________________
MONDAY MAY BE A GREAT DAY TO APPLY FOR A JOB
BUT EVERYDAY
iS A GREAT DAY TO HAVE AN ENTREPRENUERiAL
iDEA (c)
______________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________
ALL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY STARTS with a Pencil &Paper in 2D(dimension) 
Everything Else about IP(intellectual property) comes down to COMMERCE .
_______________________________________________________________________________________________